Find here an overview of all blog posts, in reversed order of publication.
Continue reading →‘Teaching for the Neuroinclusive Classroom’: joining expert project
I am very excited to join the team of the expert developmental project ‘Teaching for the Neuroinclusive Classroom’ at Aarhus University (Denmark).
- Project PI: Dr Katrin Heimann
- Funding: LB Fonden
- Project website: https://ced.au.dk/en/research/teaching-for-the-neurodiverse-classroom
Collaborators:
- Amos Blanto, Postdoc, Aarhus University
- Dyi Huijg, Postdoc, University of Roehampton
- Federica Cavaletti, Postdoc, University of Milan
- Florencia Campise, PhD fellow, CONICET
- Ida Rebsdorf Gregersen, Educational Counsellor, Aarhus University
- Joe Dumit, Professor, University of California
- Julia Ouzi, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, King’s College London
- Maciej Wodziński, Assistant Researcher, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
- Oliver Rasmus Tonning, student of psychology, University of Copenhagen
- Savhannah Schulz, Postdoc, Aarhus University
- Stephanie Lee Ellison, anthropologist
Find more information on the project’s website:
“This project relies on a participatory design, involving a neurodiverse group of academics and educational developers, bringing their own experiences and motivations for creating neuroinclusive university classrooms.”
The group will use co-creative design activities and conduct qualitative investigations of their own and others’ experiences to explore and adapt community-building and collaboration-enhancing activities for use in neurodiverse classrooms.”
The project aims to support university teachers in the task of creating a thriving community of diverse learners. It will document the design and application of concrete activities and frameworks, facilitating collaboration in neurodiverse classrooms in higher education, and it will establish a new foundation for teacher consultation provided by the CED, with a focus on neurodiversity-related opportunities and challenges.”
2025: Eco-Ability & the Cripping Pedagogy Reading Groups announcement
Here a brief announcement about the current 2024 ADHD Reading Group and the Eco-Ability (1st Fri/mo) and the Cripping Pedagogy (3rd Fri/mo) Reading Groups that take place in 2025.
Continue reading →SURVEY INVITE for black, brown and BAME ADHD women & AFAB non-binary ADHDers and for trans ADHD women in the UK
Fieldwork for this project has now been closed
This is an invite for ADHD women and non-binary AFAB ADHDers in the UK to participate in the survey (phase 3, 2024) of the research project ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World‘.
Optional participation in Phase 4: one chat with the researcher (Dr Dyi Huijg). This conversation will be audio recorded. (More information here.)

LIVE: Survey ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World’ (phase 3, 2024)
Fieldwork for this project has now been closed
ADHD women and non-binary AFAB ADHDers living in the United Kingdom, who are eligible, are invited to participate in the survey for the project ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World’ (phase 3, 2024).
Optional participation: one recorded conversation (phase 4).
UPDATE
- Survey (phase 3): till 18 October 2024
- Conversations (phase 4): till 25 October2024
Research project: Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy
Recently I started with an international, interdisciplinary and generally fabulous team the research project ‘Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy’. With a small section of the ADHD reading group (i.e. the research team) we are reflecting together on our participation in and facilitation of the reading group. We are all ADHDers.
Continue reading →Update special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’ (CJDS)
This is a brief announcement that a significant number of abstracts have been accepted for the special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’, to be published in the open access (and thus freely accessible) online journal Canadian Journal of Disability Studies (CJDS). The special issue is organised by Dr Eric Olund and yours truly (Dr Dyi Huijg). A first round of abstracts was accepted in 2022, then we invited additional abstracts in 2024 (recently). Unfortunately, due to circumstances we had to depart from the workshops that we planned initially. But still: only ADHDers contribute. The abstracts are very interdisciplinary – including a few artistic/creative contributions. And they both (1) push back against the medical/individual model of ADHD and (2) push forward the critical and intersectional thinking about ADHDness. We are very excited and really look forward to writing our own articles and reading all the papers of the other contributors. As the field of Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought is emerging, we expect that there will be a significant time in between the submission of articles to the CJDS and the reviewing and rerturn of articles as, this being an emerging field, there are no ‘experts’ as of yet. As such, it will take possibly more time than publishing already takes before the individual articles and the special issue will be up. While not in workshop-format, from the abstracts we have been able to propose a number of symposia (pre-organised panels around a specific theme) for the Leeds Disability Studies Conference 2024, for those who are up for it. So that is something to look forward to in the interim :). I will keep you updated about the progress!
Find here the 2024 Call for (additional) Papers for the special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’, so that you have an idea what to expect from the special issue.
Call for Abstracts
Deadline extended to 28 Oct >> Call for Abstracts: for the WORKSHOP (and Special Issue) : ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’
The survey is live!
Th survey (phase 1) of the the intersectional and sociological research project ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World’ is live now (it will stay online 17 Jan – 14 Oct 2022).
Check the links to learn more:
- ADHD Women: Invite for Participation
- Can I participate?
- Participant Information Sheet: Phase 1
- Survey
- I have a question…
- Can I receive updates about the project?
If you want to go to the survey immediately, click here: https://roehamptonuniversity.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/adhd-women-survey-phase-1
What are ‘neuronormativity’ and ‘neurodiversity’?
The way I use ‘neurodiversity’ in the project ADHD Women: Resisting Neuronormativity is as…
“a(n analytical) social category that refers to, on the one hand, ‘neurodivergent’ people – e.g. people with Tourettes, ADHDers, autistics – and, on the other hand, ‘neurotypical’ people. To emphasise, the ‘neuro’ here refers to a social categorical ‘neuro-difference’, which neither alludes to an affirmation of a biomedical qualification, nor to a neutral social difference” (Huijg, 2020, pp.214-215; emphases not in original).
Neuronormativity, to simplify for now, refers to
barriers, norms, values, ideas etc. generated by the hegemony of ‘neurotypicality’ and ‘neuro-ableism’.
Mind, neither neurodiversity, neuronormativity and neuro-ableism, nor neurodiversity studies suffice. The project focusses intersectionally on neuronormativity in the form of anti-ADHD ableism and anti-ADHD injustices and inequalities.
I’ll write more about my approach to ‘neuronormativity’ and ‘neurodiversity’ in the future.
Reference:
Huijg, D.D. (2020). “Neuronormativity in theorising agency: An argument for a critical neurodiversity approach.” In: Hanna Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, Nick Chown & Anna Stenning (Eds), Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm (pp.213-217): Routledge. [Invited book chapter] [Open access version]
ADHD Whiteness: An Exploration of the (Absent) Role of Race in Adult ADHD Research
SUMMARY: This is the blog post for the flipped webinar Intersectional Approaches to Disability and Race, which was held on 9 July 2021. This blog post explores how the field of ADHD research is grounded in majority white research populations or ignores race altogether; arguably, it produces white knowledge about (adult) ADHD. UK Government data suggests raced and gendered ADHD disparities, but argues that these do not exist. Critical race and feminist questions emerge about ADHD and ADHD lives, experiences and perspectives, but remain unanswered. Medical research is not sufficient. We need a field of Critical ADHD Studies, which is ADHD-affirmative, intersectional, and produced by ADHDers themselves.
Continue reading →