Research project: Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy

Recently I started with an international, interdisciplinary and generally fabulous team the research project ‘Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy’. With a small section of the ADHD reading group (i.e. the research team) we are reflecting together on our participation in and facilitation of the reading group. We are all ADHDers. From my side, as an ADHD woman myself, the research project ‘Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy’ is part of the larger research project which I conduct alone (i.e. without a research team) called ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World’. In the Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy research project, then, I take part autoethnographically as an ADHD woman – i.e. as PI (principal investigator) of and as part of the larger research team – conducting a (retrospective) collaborative autoethnography. You can find details on the project’s page on the reading groups’ website or on this page on the current website.

This is the research team:

  • Dr Dyi Dieuwertje Huijg (PI), University of Roehampton
  • Dr Eric Olund, University of Sheffield
  • Dr Rudolph Reyes II, Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary (USA)
  • Dr Jane Dryden, Mount Allison University (Canada)
  • Laura Basten, PhD candidate, Free University Berlin (Germany)
  • Dr Warren Whitaker, Molloy University (USA)
  • Dr Kate, independent researcher (USA)
  • Dr Jake Pyne, York University (Canada)
Posted by Dyi in ADHD Pedagogy, ADHD Women, Critical ADHD Studies, Intersectionality, Reading Groups, Relaxed Pedagogy (RelaxPed)

2025 reading groups: the Eco-Ability RG & the Cripping Pedagogy RG

Here a brief announcement about the current 2024 ADHD Reading Group and the scheduled 2025 Eco-Ability and the Cripping Pedagogy Reading Groups.

The reading group(s) – the Intersectional Neurodiversity and Disability Reading Groups – have run in various forms since July 2019 (3rd Friday of the month) and Jan 2020 (1st Friday of the month). In 2022 first and then resumed in 2024, one of the ‘spin-off’ readings groups has been, or rather is, the ADHD Reading Group (ADHD-RG), running on both Fridays. However the ADHD-RG which will not continue in 2025. Frankly, it has already proven to be almost impossible to find readings that we don’t want to (or must!) tear apart and, instead, that forward our critical and intersectional thinking about ADHDness, so I cannot imagine having to find even more articles for us to read (or, rather, tear apart)! I might organise an ADHD-RG v2 when all the articles have been published for the special issue Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back, that I am co-organising.

Rather than returning to separate reading groups in 2025 – one on neurodiversity and one on disability (as in the period 2019-2022) – I have decided to continue with ‘thematic reading groups’. I was moving back and forth between themes, but found it important to have one theme that is perhaps more about process and form (here: pedagogy) where the other one is more about a topic (here: eco-ability). In 2025 (always 3-4.30pm UK), I have opted for two reading groups:

  • The Eco-Ability Reading Group (or: the Eco-Ability Reading Group: Disability, Environmental & Animal Justice). Per the tin, we will read and discuss texts on the nexus of disability justice and/or environmental justice and animal justice. The Eco-Ability RG will take place on the 1st Friday of the month. You can find the (currently provisional) reading list & schedule on this page here. I’ve to admit that I use ‘eco-ability’, and I might well find that after properly engaging with the topic that the reading group doesn’t sufficiently do justice to ‘eco-ability’ as a movement, as an area of thought and critique etc. That’s a bit of the risk of a reading group: I do my best to select texts, and where possible consult others who are more knowledgeable, but I do not read all the texts beforehand. In other words: a reading group is not like teaching. It has a (crip) pedagogy of its own. Which is a nice seque to…..
  • The Cripping Pedagogy Reading Group (or: the Cripping Pedagogy Reading Group: Cripping, Sickening, Neurodiversifying & Maddening Pedagogy). Per the tin, we will read and discuss texts that crip, sicken, neurodiversify and/or madden pedagogy – all to a greater or lesser extent building on a ‘critical pedagogy’ (in itself buidling on ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’) orientation. I have a list of 50 potential readings, so will ‘just’ need to make a selection now. But I put up a placeholder page (with a schedule of dates already), which you can find here, so just keep an eye out for the actual list.

Read here more on the Co-Constructing ADHD Pedagogy research project that a few of us in the reading group are conducting (on ourselves and on each other). To emphasise, the Cripping Pedagogy RG will be helpful for us to make sense of ADHD Pedagogy, but is not specifically (only, or particularly) about ADHD Pedagogy!

If you want to join one or more reading groups / meetings, or just want to be kept in the loop and/or have access to the readings (all legit reasons), just copy-paste the questions with your answers in an email to the reading groups’ email address per the instructions on this page here. Registration means zero obligation to attend. FWIW: I keep zilch admin of who attends. Attend if/as/when. And no need to even let me know if you are or are not attending (but you’re welcome to if you want to.) Mind, the participation/facilitation/accessibility guidelines etc. are not everyone’s cup of tea, but that’s fine too: they might (sometimes) work for you, or they might not (at all or always).

Posted by Dyi in ADHD Pedagogy, Critical ADHD Studies, Reading Groups, Relaxed Pedagogy (RelaxPed)

Update special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’ (CJDS)

This is a brief announcement that a significant number of abstracts have been accepted for the special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’, to be published in the open access (and thus freely accessible) online journal Canadian Journal of Disability Studies (CJDS). The special issue is organised by Dr Eric Olund and yours truly (Dr Dyi Huijg). A first round of abstracts was accepted in 2022, then we invited additional abstracts in 2024 (recently). Unfortunately, due to circumstances we had to depart from the workshops that we planned initially. But still: only ADHDers contribute. The abstracts are very interdisciplinary – including a few artistic/creative contributions. And they both (1) push back against the medical/individual model of ADHD and (2) push forward the critical and intersectional thinking about ADHDness. We are very excited and really look forward to writing our own articles and reading all the papers of the other contributors. As the field of Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought is emerging, we expect that there will be a significant time in between the submission of articles to the CJDS and the reviewing and rerturn of articles as, this being an emerging field, there are no ‘experts’ as of yet. As such, it will take possibly more time than publishing already takes before the individual articles and the special issue will be up. While not in workshop-format, from the abstracts we have been able to propose a number of symposia (pre-organised panels around a specific theme) for the Leeds Disability Studies Conference 2024, for those who are up for it. So that is something to look forward to in the interim :). I will keep you updated about the progress!

Find here the 2024 Call for (additional) Papers for the special issue ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’, so that you have an idea what to expect from the special issue.

Posted by Dyi in Critical ADHD Studies, Intersectionality

Call for Abstracts

Deadline extended to 28 Oct >> Call for Abstracts: for the WORKSHOP (and Special Issue) : ‘Critical and Intersectional ADHD Thought: ADHDers Think Back’

Posted by Dyi

The survey is live!

Th survey (phase 1) of the the intersectional and sociological research project ‘ADHD Women: Resisting a Neuronormative World’ is live now (it will stay online 17 Jan – 14 Oct 2022).

Check the links to learn more:

If you want to go to the survey immediately, click here: https://roehamptonuniversity.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/adhd-women-survey-phase-1

Posted by Dyi in ADHD Women

What are ‘neuronormativity’ and ‘neurodiversity’?

The way I use ‘neurodiversity’ in the project ADHD Women: Resisting Neuronormativity is as…

“a(n analytical) social category that refers to, on the one hand, ‘neurodivergent’ people – e.g. people with Tourettes, ADHDers, autistics – and, on the other hand, ‘neurotypical’ people. To emphasise, the ‘neuro’ here refers to a social categorical ‘neuro-difference’, which neither alludes to an affirmation of a biomedical qualification, nor to a neutral social difference” (Huijg, 2020, pp.214-215; emphases not in original).

Neuronormativity, to simplify for now, refers to

barriers, norms, values, ideas etc. generated by the hegemony of ‘neurotypicality’ and ‘neuro-ableism’.

Mind, neither neurodiversity, neuronormativity and neuro-ableism, nor neurodiversity studies suffice. The project focusses intersectionally on neuronormativity in the form of anti-ADHD ableism and anti-ADHD injustices and inequalities.

I’ll write more about my approach to ‘neuronormativity’ and ‘neurodiversity’ in the future.

Reference:

Huijg, D.D. (2020). “Neuronormativity in theorising agency: An argument for a critical neurodiversity approach.” In: Hanna Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, Nick Chown & Anna Stenning (Eds), Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm (pp.213-217): Routledge. [Invited book chapter] [Open access version]

Posted by Dyi in ADHD Women, Neurodiversity, Neurodiversity & Neuronormativity

ADHD Whiteness: An Exploration of the (Absent) Role of Race in Adult ADHD Research

SUMMARY: This is the blog post for the flipped webinar Intersectional Approaches to Disability and Race, which was held on 9 July 2021. This blog post explores how the field of ADHD research is grounded in majority white research populations or ignores race altogether; arguably, it produces white knowledge about (adult) ADHD. UK Government data suggests raced and gendered ADHD disparities, but argues that these do not exist. Critical race and feminist questions emerge about ADHD and ADHD lives, experiences and perspectives, but remain unanswered. Medical research is not sufficient. We need a field of Critical ADHD Studies, which is ADHD-affirmative, intersectional, and produced by ADHDers themselves.

Continue reading →
Posted by Dyi in ADHD Women, Critical ADHD Studies

The Problem with Accessibility Checklists

SUMMARY: Accessibility checklists are increasingly becoming offered as ways to improve inclusivity in Higher Education. However, they rely on the presumption that those delivering education and thus using them have no accessibility needs of their own. Moreover, in seeking to codify what counts as inclusivity, many students’ requirements get overlooked. In this post, Dr Kelsie Acton and Dr Dieuwertje Dyi Huijg outline the problems with accessibility checklists and propose a praxis of ‘relaxed pedagogy’ in their place.

Continue reading →
Posted by Dyi in Relaxed Pedagogy (RelaxPed)

Relaxed Pedagogy: Relaxing Teaching and Learning in the University

This blog post, by Dr Dyi Dieuwertje Huijg and Dr Kelsie Action, was originally published for the flipped conference ‘Building the Post-Pandemic University’ (published 10 Sep 2020, panel on 18 Sep 2020)

Digital and distance learning in the pandemic university has created access to higher education teaching (HET) for disabled[1] students – and staff, to some extent – where this was not offered before by Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Despite disabled learners’ need for proper digital access, HEIs insisted for years that digital learning was impossible. When faced with the pandemic, they rapidly pivoted; within weeks they transitioned to digital and distance learning. After years of debates about mobile phones and computers in the classroom, all of a sudden students were ‘allowed’ to always use their digital device; and, at least hypothetically, learning and teaching while lying down became an option. At the same time, disabled students and staff, as well as disability practitioners, have addressed the access gap in the pandemic university, which nevertheless seems to have low priority in policy. Unsurprisingly, there are concerns how this will develop in the post-lockdown university.

Continue reading →
Posted by Dyi in Relaxed Pedagogy (RelaxPed)
Dr Dyi Dieuwertje Huijg